Based in Los Angeles, California, Attorney Eric Rasmussen leads a law firm that focuses on personal injury and real estate matters. One area in which Eric Rasmussen has extensive knowledge of as attorney is the intricacies of comparative negligence rules in personal injury cases.
As a comparative negligence state, California bases recovery decisions on the degree of the defendant’s fault versus that of the plaintiff. The type of comparative negligence in California is “pure,” which means that injured parties are able to collect damages, even in cases where they were 99 percent at fault for the accident.
Unlike modified comparative negligence states, the amount of fault in California is not capped at 50 percent. However, the plaintiff’s award can be decreased by the person’s percentage of fault. As an example, if a plaintiff is found to have been 25 percent at fault for a vehicle accident, he or she receives 75 percent of a hypothetical $100,000 verdict. If the percentage of fault assigned is higher, the recovery amount decreases correspondingly.
Maximizing a California recovery award involves hiring an experienced attorney who is able to prove that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care that was breached and that this resulted in an accident.

